Best 240Hz 1440p Gaming Monitors 2026
The best 240Hz 1440p gaming monitors in 2026 , from budget IPS panels under $300 to QD-OLED flagships. Paired for RTX 5060/5070 and RX 9070 XT builds.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links — this doesn't affect our picks.

LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B 27-inch QHD 240Hz IPS Gaming Monitor
Our top recommendation for this category
In this guide
- LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B: Best Value 240Hz 1440p Monitor
- ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM: Best for NVIDIA G-Sync Systems
- Samsung Odyssey G7: Best Contrast and Curve
- Gigabyte M27Q X: Cheapest 240Hz 1440p Worth Buying
- Alienware AW2725DF: Best QD-OLED 240Hz 1440p Monitor
- Buying Guide: How to Pick a 240Hz 1440p Monitor
- Bottom Line
If you just dropped $350 on an RTX 5060 or RX 9070 XT, you already know the problem: that 144Hz 1080p panel you've had since 2021 is holding you back. These new mid-range GPUs can genuinely push 200+ fps in competitive titles at 1440p. A 240Hz QHD monitor is the logical next move.
The good news is that 240Hz 1440p monitors got dramatically cheaper in 2026. You can now get a solid IPS panel at this refresh rate for under $300, a price point that would have bought you a mediocre 144Hz monitor three years ago. The bad news is that picking between IPS, VA, and QD-OLED has gotten more confusing, not less.
I spent time digging through RTINGS data, TFTCentral reviews, and a lot of r/buildapc threads to put together this guide. These are the monitors I'd actually recommend.
| Monitor | Panel | Price | Refresh Rate | Response Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B | IPS | ~$290 | 240Hz | 1ms GTG | Best Value |
| ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM | Fast IPS | ~$540 | 240Hz | 1ms GTG | G-Sync Builds |
| Samsung Odyssey G7 | VA | ~$420 | 240Hz | 1ms MPRT | Best Contrast |
| Gigabyte M27Q X | SS IPS | ~$280 | 240Hz | 1ms MPRT | Budget Pick |
| Alienware AW2725DF | QD-OLED | ~$600 | 360Hz | 0.03ms | Premium OLED |
LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B: Best Value 240Hz 1440p Monitor

LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B 27-inch QHD 240Hz IPS Gaming Monitor
Pros
- Exceptional value for 240Hz 1440p IPS
- DCI-P3 95% color coverage
- HDMI 2.1 for console use
- G-Sync and FreeSync compatible
Cons
- DisplayHDR 400, decent but not transformative
- Stand doesn't swivel
- No built-in USB hub
Look, I wasn't expecting much at this price. The LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B routinely dips to $280-$290 on Amazon, and at that number, it's genuinely hard to argue against.
The IPS panel is the highlight. You're getting 95% DCI-P3 color coverage, which is notably better than the ~80% DCI-P3 you'd see on many budget monitors. RTINGS gave it high marks for color accuracy out of the box, the kind of calibration you'd normally pay more for. And the 240Hz refresh rate combined with 1ms GTG response time means motion is crisp, not smeared.
Where it stumbles: the stand. You can tilt and adjust height, but there's no swivel. Not a dealbreaker, but worth noting if you're planning a multi-monitor setup. The HDR performance is "fine." The panel can hit 400 nits peak, but it lacks local dimming zones, so HDR content looks washed out compared to Mini-LED or OLED options.
But for $290? It competes directly with monitors that used to cost $500. If you're pairing this with an RTX 5060 or RX 9070 XT and want the best 240Hz 1440p experience at the lowest price, this is the one.
ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM: Best for NVIDIA G-Sync Systems

ASUS ROG Swift PG279QM 27-inch 1440P 240Hz Fast IPS Gaming Monitor
Pros
- Native G-Sync module for rock-solid variable refresh
- NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer built in
- Excellent factory color accuracy
- Fast IPS panel with strong motion clarity
Cons
- Premium price vs IPS alternatives
- G-Sync adds cost if you're on AMD
- Bulkier stand than some competitors
The ROG Swift PG279QM is older but still competitive. ASUS loaded this one with a native G-Sync module, not just G-Sync Compatible, which is the cheaper certification that runs on FreeSync hardware. You're getting the real deal here, with a dedicated G-Sync ASIC for the most consistent variable refresh rate performance.
There's also the NVIDIA Reflex Latency Analyzer, which is a built-in latency measurement tool. If you're running a G-Sync-compatible mouse and an RTX GPU, it'll display your actual system latency on screen. Useful for competitive players, niche for everyone else.
The Fast IPS panel runs at 240Hz with 1ms GTG response. In practice, the motion clarity is noticeably better than slower IPS panels, with less coronation on fast-moving objects. Color accuracy is solid at factory settings, covering around 92% DCI-P3.
Honestly, if you're on an AMD GPU, skip this one. You're paying a premium for NVIDIA-specific features that won't matter to you. But for RTX 5060/5070/5080 builds where you want the complete NVIDIA ecosystem? Hard to beat.
Samsung Odyssey G7: Best Contrast and Curve

Samsung Odyssey G7 27-inch WQHD 240Hz 1000R Curved Gaming Monitor
Pros
- VA panel delivers deep blacks and high contrast
- 1000R curve is genuinely immersive
- HDR600 certification with solid brightness
- Strong motion performance for a VA panel
Cons
- VA smearing visible in very dark scenes
- Aggressive 1000R curve not for everyone
- Older model, fewer ports than newer panels
Here's where things get interesting. The Odyssey G7 uses a VA panel instead of IPS, and that's either a feature or a dealbreaker, depending on how you game.
VA panels have significantly higher native contrast ratios than IPS, typically 3000:1 versus 1000:1. That means blacks look genuinely black rather than the slightly gray wash you get on IPS in dark rooms. For horror games, space sims, anything with deep shadows: the G7 looks noticeably better than the LG or ASUS.
The tradeoff is VA smearing. Fast-moving objects in dark scenes can show a trailing effect that IPS panels don't exhibit. Samsung has done a solid job with the G7's overdrive settings to minimize this, but it's still there if you're looking. Competitive FPS players who spend time in bright environments won't care. Horror game fans who notice every frame will.
The 1000R curve is genuinely aggressive. It works well for a single 27-inch panel on a desk, and it adds to the immersion for racing games and sims. That said, some people find it disorienting for productivity work.
If your priority is contrast and HDR performance at 240Hz 1440p, this is the pick. Otherwise, the LG at $290 makes more sense.
Gigabyte M27Q X: Cheapest 240Hz 1440p Worth Buying

Gigabyte M27Q X 27-inch 240Hz 1440P KVM SS IPS Gaming Monitor
Pros
- Lowest price for a quality 240Hz 1440p IPS panel
- Built-in KVM switch for multi-device setups
- 92% DCI-P3 color coverage
- USB-C with display signal support
Cons
- 1ms MPRT response (not GTG, different measurement)
- OSD menu is clunky
- Some backlight bleed reported in reviews
The M27Q X undercuts essentially everything else in this category. At around $280, it's competing on price with some monitors that can't match its specs.
The Super Speed IPS panel is fast. The 1ms spec here is MPRT (moving picture response time), not GTG. It's worth clarifying because reviewers sometimes conflate the two. MPRT measures something closer to perceived blur rather than actual pixel transition speed. In practice, it still looks fast and clean. Hardware Unboxed put this monitor through its paces and called the motion handling "impressive for the price."
The built-in KVM switch is genuinely useful if you're switching between a laptop and desktop. You can plug both systems into the monitor, connect a single keyboard and mouse, and toggle between them without a separate KVM unit. For work-from-home setups where you're switching between your gaming rig and work laptop throughout the day, it's a thoughtful inclusion.
The USB-C port is a bonus. You can run display signal, power, and data over a single cable from a compatible laptop.
The OSD software is the main irritant. Navigating it requires cycling through menus with a joystick that feels like it was designed in 2015. Not a dealbreaker, but you'll set it up once and then avoid touching it.
Alienware AW2725DF: Best QD-OLED 240Hz 1440p Monitor

Alienware AW2725DF 26.7-inch QD-OLED 360Hz 1440p Gaming Monitor
Pros
- QD-OLED panel with infinite contrast and perfect blacks
- 360Hz refresh rate, beyond what most systems can push
- 0.03ms response time, effectively zero perceptible motion blur
- 99.3% DCI-P3 color coverage
Cons
- OLED burn-in risk for static elements (lower brightness for static logos)
- Price premium over IPS alternatives is real
- 26.7-inch panel feels slightly small for the price
The AW2725DF is the monitor I'd buy if budget wasn't a concern. Full stop.
QD-OLED at 360Hz is borderline overkill for most gaming setups. But that 0.03ms response time and infinite contrast ratio changes how games look in a way that's immediately obvious. Pop in a dark-scene game, any dark-scene game, and the difference between this panel and even a good IPS monitor is immediate. You're not just seeing deeper blacks; you're seeing the full range of detail in shadow areas that washes out on LCD panels.
The 360Hz isn't something most GPUs will saturate at 1440p, but for competitive titles like CS2 or Valorant, where you're running low graphics settings to maximize frames, and an RTX 5070 or 5080 can genuinely push frame rates that make 360Hz meaningful.
The burn-in concern is real, worth mentioning without catastrophizing it. Keep brightness in the 200-250 nit range for regular use, enable pixel shift, and don't leave static UI elements on screen for hours. Alienware builds in an OLED protection mode that handles most of this automatically. Just don't ignore the warnings in the setup guide.
It launched at $900 and has been hovering around $600-650 in 2026. At that price it's competitive. At the $500 it hit during February sales, it was a steal.
Buying Guide: How to Pick a 240Hz 1440p Monitor
IPS vs VA vs QD-OLED: Which Panel for Your Use Case?
IPS is the safe choice. Good viewing angles, accurate color, and fast pixel response. The LG 27GR83Q-B and ASUS PG279QM are both solid IPS picks. If you're unsure, default to IPS.
VA panels (like the Samsung G7) win on contrast. If you game in a dark room and HDR matters to you, the deeper blacks are worth the trade-off of slight VA smearing in fast dark scenes.
QD-OLED (Alienware AW2725DF) is the premium option. Best image quality available, best motion clarity, infinite contrast. The price gap is closing but still meaningful.
Do You Actually Need 240Hz Over 165Hz?
Honestly, it depends. For competitive shooters (Valorant, CS2, Apex), the jump from 165Hz to 240Hz is noticeable. Studies on competitive gaming show a perceivable difference up to around 240Hz for trained players. Beyond that, gains diminish sharply.
For RPGs, open-world games, single-player games: 165Hz is probably enough. But if you're pairing with a GPU that can push those frames (RTX 5060/5070 at 1080p-1440p in competitive titles), you might as well get 240Hz. The price difference is small now.
Do You Need G-Sync or Is FreeSync Enough?
In 2026, FreeSync Premium monitors work fine with NVIDIA GPUs through G-Sync Compatible mode. The frame rate range is typically 48-240Hz, which covers real-world gaming scenarios.
Native G-Sync modules (like the PG279QM) add precision at the very low end of the VRR range and can eliminate the low framerate compensation artifacts that occasionally appear in G-Sync Compatible mode. The practical difference is minor for most games.
Unless you're specifically chasing competitive purity and running an NVIDIA GPU, FreeSync Premium is fine.
Response Time: GTG vs MPRT
GTG (gray-to-gray) measures actual pixel transition speed. MPRT (moving picture response time) measures perceived motion blur using a different methodology. Both appear in specs as "1ms" but they're measuring different things.
Neither is inherently better, but they're not comparable. A 1ms GTG panel and a 1ms MPRT panel don't necessarily look the same in motion. The Gigabyte M27Q X uses MPRT; the LG 27GR83Q-B uses GTG. Both look fast in practice, just don't treat them as equivalent specs.
Frequently asked questions
- What GPU do I need to run 240Hz at 1440p?
- For competitive titles (CS2, Valorant, Apex) at low-medium settings, an RTX 5060 or RX 9070 XT can push 240+ fps at 1440p. For AAA games at ultra settings, you're looking at RTX 5070 or better. The sweet spot is pairing a mid-range GPU with competitive settings to hit those frame rates.
- Is 240Hz 1440p worth it over 144Hz 1440p?
- For competitive gamers, yes. The jump from 144Hz to 240Hz is genuinely noticeable in fast-paced titles. For casual or single-player gaming, 165Hz is probably the sweet spot. The price difference between 144Hz and 240Hz 1440p panels has shrunk to the point that it's worth paying the small premium if you play any competitive titles.
- Should I get IPS or VA for a 240Hz 1440p monitor?
- IPS if you play in mixed lighting conditions, value color accuracy, or play competitive shooters where motion clarity matters most. VA if you primarily game in a dark room, care about HDR performance, and don't mind slight smearing in dark fast-moving scenes. IPS is the safer default for most people.
- Will the Samsung Odyssey G7 work with my PS5 or Xbox?
- Yes, it has HDMI 2.0 ports, though the PS5 outputs at 4K/120Hz or 1080p/120Hz rather than 1440p (Sony still hasn't enabled native 1440p on PS5 via HDMI). For Xbox Series X, 1440p/120Hz does work over HDMI 2.0. The LG 27GR83Q-B with HDMI 2.1 is the better console choice if console gaming is a priority.
- How much should I spend on a 240Hz 1440p monitor in 2026?
- Budget tier: $280-$300 (Gigabyte M27Q X, LG 27GR83Q-B). Mid-range: $400-$550 (Samsung Odyssey G7, ASUS PG279QM). Premium: $600+ (Alienware AW2725DF). For most people pairing with an RTX 5060 or RX 9070 XT, the LG 27GR83Q-B at $290 is the obvious value play.
- Is the Alienware AW2725DF worth the premium over IPS options?
- If image quality and HDR are priorities, yes, unambiguously. The QD-OLED panel makes dark scenes look categorically different from IPS. If you primarily play competitive titles at max brightness where contrast isn't the differentiator, the $300 premium over the LG doesn't make as much sense. It's genuinely a great monitor that launched at the wrong price and now sits in a more defensible range.
Bottom Line
The LG UltraGear 27GR83Q-B at $290 is the answer for most people: 240Hz, 1440p, IPS, excellent color, all for less than a GPU upgrade. The Gigabyte M27Q X is the other budget option worth considering if you need a KVM switch or USB-C display.
Step up to the Samsung Odyssey G7 if HDR and contrast matter, or the ASUS PG279QM if you're building a full NVIDIA ecosystem. The Alienware AW2725DF is the premium option that justifies its price if you care about what a monitor is actually capable of. The QD-OLED panel genuinely changes how dark games look.
240Hz at 1440p used to be expensive. In 2026, there's no reason to settle for less.
WEEKLY PICKS
New gear picks, every week.
No fluff. No sponsored garbage. Just the best stuff we actually found this week.
Unsubscribe anytime. We hate spam too.
How We Test
We score products by combining spec-level research, pricing history, trusted third-party benchmarks, and owner sentiment from high-signal sources.
- Performance and real-world value in the category this guide targets
- Price-to-performance and deal consistency over recent pricing windows
- Build quality, reliability patterns, and known long-term issues
- Recommendation refresh cadence to keep these picks current
Author
TheTechSearch Editorial Team
Independent product reviewers & PC builders
We test and compare real-world specs, price trends, and user feedback to recommend gear that actually makes sense to buy.